.png)
Have you ever heard the phrase, "When a toddler is silent, trouble's a-brewing?"
As a parent of a toddler, I have found that SILENCE is VERY troubling and I take that advice to heart these days.
It's no secret the rise of the 2A Sanctuary Movement has created some anxiety for Democratic Lawmakers and their Gun Control Lobbying backers. As Virginia's Gun Owners take a stand against tyranny from within, the rest of the nation watches as The First State makes history, yet again. With all of this excitement, one has to wonder... "Where's the Gun Grabbing media?"
Of course Sheriff Scott Jenkins has a hit piece out on him, that Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand Action, wasted NO TIME in helping push.
Let's not kid ourselves! Watts is a PR pro! She knows that THAT article has NO VALUE, whatsoever. For TWO YEARS, NBC Washington has been "investigating" Sheriff Jenkins and NOTHING has been proven, so, WHY the push, Shan?
Could it be that, like most PR pros know, she needs "filler?" (Not like lips and cheeks) "Filler," in the media world, are little tidbits that take up time and space. Like looking at a newspaper and seeing a ton of jokes and ads on a page that's supposed to be full of news. Filler fills the gaps for the lack of news.
Recently, the LEO news site, Law Enforcement Today, put out an article where THOUSANDS of Cops, Veterans, Supporters pledge to join the militia in Virginia to combat UNconstitutional laws. With this type of uprising by LAW ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS, as well as word through the grapevine that the Virginia National Guard is not too happy with VA Democrats throwing them under the bus, I wonder why Shannon Watts and her Mommy Tyrants haven't tried to counter any of this info.
On December 11th, 2019, Mom At Arms uncovered some info via FOIA in regards to Loudoun County, VA Chair, Phyllis Randall- who did not take off her Moms Demand button during a 2A Sanctuary/ Board of Supervisors meeting on December 6th, 2019. When another board member asked her politely to take off the button, Ms. Randall said no, because Moms Demand was not partisan. (That article HERE)
Mom At Arms, also through FOIA, found deeper information that places Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America volunteers in the midst of conversations prior to that meeting... and after... with legislators. (Guess which political party!!! If you can't, hang tight and I'll tell ya!) Mom At Arms published another article on that same day of December 11th, 2019 because of those FOIA findings... to make Loudoun County, VA Gun Owners aware of the communications between Moms Demand and political heads- prior to the Board of Supervisors meeting being held THAT SAME NIGHT. (Click HERE to get the answer about which political party that didn't start with an "R")
In that article linked above (HERE too), you'll see where a Moms Demand LEADER reached out to me, Jill (Mom At Arms creator), personally to remove her information from the Mom At Arms article originally published on December 11th, 2019. If you don't know the whole story, I reacted in kind to her request- by having the article revised on December 17, 2019. I do, in fact, still have the information that was originally published and NOT ONCE DID MOM AT ARMS REVEAL THIS MOMS DEMAND LEADER'S PERSONAL INFO. We actually covered up most of what SHE PUBLICLY ADVERTISES OF HERSELF... and yet, in the DM to me, she implies that I am threatening her- WHICH NEVER HAPPENED.
But I do take her position as a Moms Demand volunteer to sway political action, which limits American's freedoms... or eradicates them completely... as a threat to the livelihood and well-being of myself and family. Granted her message was covered in sugar, I know for a FACT that her family's lives were never at risk... but more so the position of her personal/ home business (as she even states in the message)- which SHE advertises... PUBLICLY. (I'm not saying she doesn't care about her family, either. Just saying that wasn't the point of asking me to remove info linking her to her business. Which again, is public... as well as her works with Moms Demand- prior to any Mom At Arms article.)
She used the whole "motherhood" route to pull on those heartstrings, which is what Moms Demand Action does best. Because of this and the fact that I KNOW she was after MY integrity, I posted a video on my personal Facebook page with a clear message to ANYONE who doubts me. It's also shared on Mom At Arms' Facebook page (linked at bottom of this article).
I'm pretty sure at some point, Mom At Arms will be used as a scapegoat by Moms Demand Action to get people to think that we are a bunch of heathens out to harm these "volunteers." That is how they work. But... that assumption cannot be further from the truth. As a matter of fact, anyone who considers themselves a God Fearing Constitutionalist would be STUPID to even attempt such awful acts against them... or anyone, just because we disagree. Like I've stated before, myself and the members of Mom At Arms DO NOT CONDONE VIOLENCE OF ANY SORT... and we NEVER HAVE. And per Mrs. Swanson's implications... I have the proof that Mom At Arms went above and beyond to discredit her claims in her DM to me.
Because Moms Demand Action needs that "Filler" for this time where they've got NOTHING going on, they are instead lashing out at anyone and anything that is a threat to their organization, and trying to shut them up. Example: Sheriff Scott Jenkins... and now... Mom At Arms. Word on the street is that they're cancelling public events that they originally had scheduled, to make them more private... for those "intimate discussions."
Like a toddler's silence deceives a mother's ears...
Opmerkingen